| Subject: | Re: RE: [RESOGUIT-L] Is Bluegrass the new Jazz | | Date: | , April 1, 2007 04:53:49 (+0200) | | From: | Resobud <bluegrassservices @...com>
|
In my experence Bluegrass is traditional like Monroe and the Bluegrass Boys and
Bluegrass Jazz is more Newgrass like that which was started not so long ago if
you are in your 50's
Resobud
"Foote,Tom" <FooteT@evergreen.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: David Tanner [mailto:dcsrt@qwest.net]
> Sent: Fri 3/30/2007 7:16 PM
> To: resoguit-l@elistas.com
> Subject: Re: [RESOGUIT-L] Is Bluegrass the new Jazz
>
>
>
> Do you think that The Tony Rice Unit doesn't swing? I would agree,
> though, that most traditional bluegrass doesn't really swing. As
> noted before, it drives! I like it all. - Dave
>
> On Mar 23, 2007, at 6:32 AM, Bill McCloskey wrote:
>
> > I think you might get some arguements that Bluegrass doesn't swing.
> >
>
> hm-m-mm... well, sometimes 'groove' is what me really mean when we
>
> say swing.. like, for instance, on Peter Rowan's "blue" album that he =
> did
>
> years ago (the station has it on vinyl) there's a cut of "Cabin of =
> Love".
>
> It's the only tune on the entire album that Peter didn't write, and it's
=
> in
>
> an incredible groove.. the rhythm is hard to describe but whenever I
>
> used to play it (I'll have to dig it out for next week's show--assuming
=
> the
>
> station hasn't archived it) and play it..
>
> Tom
>
>
>
|
Re: RE: [RESOGUIT-
Reply to this message