| Subject: | Re: [socialcredit] A New Look | | Date: | Monday, May 23, 2005 09:06:57 (-0600) | | From: | Jim <jschroeder @....ca>
|
| In reply to: | Message 1452 (written by Vic Bridger) |
Hi Vic:
When you wrote the letter condemning others, I thought that perhaps you were
condemning me because I have added passages by Kant, and Kierkegaard into
this email list. My intent has always been to tie these back to the
philosophy of Social Credit. However; I guess I was mistaken, and offer a
sincere apology.
I ask that you not leave this list. I find your knowledge of Social Credit
to be invaluable. I realize that you are frustrated by some of the people
on this email list, but it is important that you stay here to fight what I
feel is a bogus representation of "Social Credit". I also know for a fact
that my knowledge on the subject is not as extensive as yours, so I'm less
equipped to fight this battle. And it is as important of battle today, as
it was decades ago.
I think if you left this list it would be a great loss, and I ask that you
stay to teach real, Douglas, Social Credit.
Take care,
Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vic Bridger" <socred@ecn.net.au>
To: <socialcredit@elistas.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: [socialcredit] A New Look
> To Bill Ryan,
>
> My time has become even more limited and reading and replying to
> particiapants on this list occupies too much time. I have written on the
> problem with people who are not prepared to learn but who wish to push
their
> own ideas and for this reason I will be unsubscribing from this list. I am
> prepared to have a dialogue with any participants on this list who
genuinely
> desire to obtain some understanding of Social Credit. I am not prepared to
> discuss with those who have their own ideas, their own agenda, and their
own
> preconceived judgements.There is too much garbage and rubbish and nonsense
> being being written which is not worth commenting upon.
>
> Whether some of these people are pushing a political party ideal, or and
> ideological ideal (Socialism), or just airing what they may consider their
> intellectual ability I am not interested. Since the inception of this
> discussion group commenced I do not believe that we have been able to
> increase awareness (unlike some other areas in which I have been involved)
> of the possibilities which could exist with the introduction of Social
> Credit policies. What I do know is that debt in all spheres has continued
to
> climb. The world debt climbs while the world fiddles. In this case it is
> many of the participants on this list. I liken it to the cliché, "Rome
burns
> while Nero fiddles".
>
> I believe that if we are to move ahead it is necessary to set an agenda.
> Have participants read some set books, do some homework and adhere to the
> subject of Social Credit. In this I would be willing to assist but until
> then I shall unsubscribe.
>
> I note your reply directly to me that the message I forwarded to elistas
re
> the Social Credit Course being instituted in the Catholic Krakow
University
> was archived. I am forwarding this to a few of the contributors to
elistas.
> Vic Bridger
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> You're subscribed to this list with the email jschroeder@shaw.ca
> To unsubscribe, send a message to
> socialcredit-unsubscribe@elistas.com
> For more information, visit http://www.eListas.com/list/socialcredit
>
|
Re: [socialcredit]
Reply to this message