Thanks for that. I am sure I was referring to the whole protracted
controversy on the subject when I used those words, not your contribution or
anyone else's in particular.
I may fail sometimes, but I try to stick to principlesn without being rude to
people.
Regards John R.
>From: Triumphofthepast@aol.com
>Reply-To:
socialcredit@elistas.com
>To: socialcredit@elistas.com
>Subject: [socialcredit]
scale
>Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 08:05:40 EDT
>
>You asked the question,
John:
>
>"Does this apply to the whole economy? Surely this is the first point
where
>controversy enters? Can we identify any 'force' that could cause a
discrepancy
>to occur at this level?"
>
>I suggest that the 'force' that causes
the discrepancy at both microcosm and
>macrocosm is improved
efficiency.
>
>Douglas invites us to see the economy as a consumer production
system.
>Government can be thought of as a consumer service bought by the
taxpayer. And
>banking of course provides that somewhat important
ingredient of a consumer
>production system, money. Financing consumption is
part of that.
>
>And since my note was only 2/3 of a page of 12 pt. type, I don't
know why you
>call it "immensely
lengthy."
>
>Michael
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>Some
introductory materials to the discussion topic of this list are
at
>http://www.geocities.com/socredus/compendium
>You're subscribed to this list
with the email johngrawson@hotmail.com
>For more information, visit
http://www.eListas.com/list/socialcredit
RE: [socialcredit]
Reply to this message
