| Subject: | [socialcredit] Re: productive capacity | | Date: | , August 2, 2005 22:15:14 (+0200) | | From: | cymric <cymric @.......nz>
|
Howdy William,
I have no problems with your explanation and I never intented to suggest you had
any other interpretation. I dont hold to that phrase for the obvious reasons
that you invite a needless fight because of a poor choice of words.
Those words may belong inside a context that justifies their use but once you
seperate them out it a head sticking up above the parapet, is it not? To refer
to goods and services seems much more practical not just for this reason but also
the layman who will be reading it. It easy to visualise goods and services, try
visualising capacity to produce in comparison?
Peter H
"William B. Ryan" <w_b_ryan@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I dont hold to the words "the capacity to produce"
> anyway because that could mean 7 days a week and
> twenty four hours a day, which is tyrany and
> potentially this is what the debt system represents.
|
Re: productive cap
Reply to this message