| Subject: | Re: [socialcredit] insurance premium? | | Date: | , August 29, 2005 22:11:52 (+0200) | | From: | cymric <cymric @.......nz>
|
Howdy Joe,
The essence of what I was getting at is that we largely talking about struggling
with symptoms of the debt money system, which is a game of cat and mouse you cant
win.
The issue of risk can only seen in relation to stability of the monetary system
and stable cost/prices. There are aspects of risk, eg fire insurance etc that
will not change but I suspect there are many things that will change once the
fundamental finance system changes, so with the nature and character of
economics.
I believe alternatives to the debt banking system inside their system wonr cause
them to change if their power is left intact. They ahve ahistory of flodding the
market with money to blame no debt money being added as the cause of inflation
and then the propoganda scares about destablising the economy etc. If there was a
transition for example like when Lincone created the greenback the volumn of
money created should have been controlled. Eg, say twenty percent debt free govt
gewnerated money and limit of 80 percent private debt money and over X years the
first one increases to 100% as the latter reduced down to 0.
There were obviously some galant men in Canada trying their best against very
big guns.
The HK and Shangai Bank wasnt a good choice. They were dancing with the devils
family banking tree.
Debt is driving the world into monopolies. This is why I believe Marx and Lenin
never bit the hand that fed them because they understood that the quickest and
easiest path to global centralisation is via capitalism. One of the purposes of
the cold war was to have everyone looking away from what was happening inside the
west. To mis-identify the enemy.
Breaking down the Berlin Wall and building corporate sweat-workshops in
communist countries and reducing western living standards is merely the
standardising for world govt uniformity around the world- Lenins dream of global
centralised democracy.
Peter H
|
Re: [socialcredit]
Reply to this message