| Subject: | [socialcredit] Re: COGEXEC: Norm Kurland: Plagiarist | | Date: | Saturday, September 3, 2005 08:56:48 (-0700) | | From: | William B. Ryan <w_b_ryan @.....com>
|
Keith, the date is merely the smoking gun. The
plagiarism is that he claims that Chalabi's proposal
is his own, and that it represents a "reversal" from
his "previous" advocacy of the Alaska model, which is
the lie. Chalabi's proposal was and continues to be
inspired by the Alaska model, which he and his
advisers repeatedly cite. They have not once
mentioned "Binary Economics" or Norm Kurland in any
public forum, despite Kurland's illusions of grandeur.
They may not be aware of the term.
You might remember a couple of years back when Rodney
Shakespeare stupidly claimed that the Alaska Dividend
was the implementation of "Binary Economics."
I replied that, on the contrary, Kelso, Gravel and
Kurland vehemently opposed the Dividend plan when it
was proposed, and tried to promote their alternative
scheme--something quite different in purpose and
intent.
That set Kurland off on his usual tirade.
-
--- Keith Wilde <keithwilde@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Sorry, Bill, but I don't get your point here. I can
> clearly see that there
> is a marked difference between the Chalabi proposal
> and that of Kurland, and
> I understand why you much prefer the Chalabi
> approach. But I do not see how
> the charge of plagiarism applies. It seems to have
> something to do with the
> date Norm claims for having spoken to the Senator
> and articles that appeared
> in various news souces, but I fail to see the
> connections that bear on the
> issue of plagiarism. I certainly don't see any
> incorporation of Douglas
> ideas in what Norm is claiming for Kelso?
>
> Keith
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "William B. Ryan" <w_b_ryan@yahoo.com>
[snipped]
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
|
Re: COGEXEC: Norm 
Reply to this message