| Subject: | [socialcredit] The mind of God | | Date: | Monday, September 5, 2005 19:02:24 (-0600) | | From: | Chick Hurst <chickhurst @....ca>
|
I honestly thought that we could carry on a rational and reasonable dialogue
but, that seems to be impossible. One side is talking apples and the other
is deliberately talking oranges, potatoes and cucumbers.
To try to make this simple, if Jim had fourteen brothers and sisters, and
don't argue whether he does or not or would or would not or could or could
not, and all had different religions. Should Jim be able to carry on a
conversation with them, whether it is a conversation about economics, the
theory of relativity, the weather, or the colour of grass, in a common
language or should he hold superior attitude toward all and alienate them
all?
Chick
|
The mind of God
Reply to this message