|
Message 2917
|
|
< Previous | Next >
|
|
|
| Subject: | [socialcredit] Per's A+B | | Date: | Monday, October 3, 2005 11:00:04 (EDT) | | From: | Triumphofthepast <Triumphofthepast @...com>
|
To my mind, this model is more complicated than is necessary to make the case (if the case is A+B). But some people might think I see it oversimplified. So I'd like other social crediters to chime in.
"What kind of processes that causes problems in the money flow, I intend to write about that when the model of the money flows in the society are accepted."
If that means, first model without Improvement of Process and then add it in, I guess it makes sense.
"changes in the production process"
Given that Improvement of Process is not modeled, I don't know what Per means by this phrase.
"The payments from the consumers to step 1 [retail] during the actual time interval are to be compared to the payments from all the different production steps during the same time interval."
Payments from all the different production steps IN GENERAL or payments from all the different production steps TO INDIVIDUALS? Should be the latter.
"All the payments in the production steps are made during the same time interval."
The question was, "To what or whom are they made?" If time moves from left to right on the charts, then the left-pointing arrows for Payments suggest that payments are made TO a previous point in time, which is absurd. In other words, this is pictorially confusing, at least to me.
Michael
|
Reply to this message