| Subject: | [socialcredit] Re: Extrapolating A+B Part 1 -- Wally responds to Marc | | Date: | Sunday, October 2, 2005 08:25:31 (-0700) | | From: | William B. Ryan <w_b_ryan @.....com>
|
| In reply to: | Message 2912 (written by Wallace M. Klinck) |
"...the need for consumer debt is eliminated. With
the elimination of the need for consumer debt, the
whole question of consumer borrowing at interest is
obviated and ceases to be an issue."
I will submit is better interpreted with the
qualification inserted below:
*...the need for consumer debt [merely to close the
gap between prices and purchasing power over the
retail counter thereby sustaining the rate of profit]
is eliminated. With the elimination of the need for
consumer debt [merely to close the gap between prices
and purchasing power over the retail counter thereby
sustaining the rate of profit], the whole question of
consumer borrowing at interest [merely to close the
gap between prices and purchasing power over the
retail counter thereby sustaining the rate of profit]
is obviated and ceases to be an issue.*
--- "Wallace M. Klinck" <wmklinck@shaw.ca> wrote:
> Dear Marc,
>
> You have written:
>
> "Now the point is that the imbalances addressed by
> the A+B theorem cannot exist if the the following
> principles are observed:
[snipped]
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
|
Re: Extrapolating 
Reply to this message