| Subject: | Re: [socialcredit] Re: questions | | Date: | Sunday, October 9, 2005 17:55:02 (-0700) | | From: | Joe Thomson <thomsonhiyu @....ca>
|
| In reply to: | Message 2925 (written by cymric) |
Hi Peter,
There should be no problem in your responding to the messages that have been
'archived', (or ''quaranteened'', as you put it). Those of us intertested in
this discussion and the A+B extrapolation have read them from the link Bill
provided, so just go ahead and respond.
I've had some problem with our computer here, (kids), and have lost all the
messages prior to October, so I'm going from memory alone, but I think Bill
did respond to the Douglas quote you provided, (the one from "Monopoly of
Credit", wasn't it, about 'profit' and a ''closed community''?). Or am I
mistaken and was there something later?
Joe
----- Original Message -----
From: <cymric@xtra.co.nz>
To: <socialcredit@elistas.com>
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 1:28 PM
Subject: [socialcredit] Re: questions
> I would appreciate some instruction as to how one is suppooed to respond
to the diverted system.
> Secondly I have never entered into the argument based on bankers under
consumption and the reason is it is a red herring.
> I have already answered the homework question re where does profit margins
come from. I produced a Douglas quote which you never acknowledged that
answered it.
> I suggest that quoting from Douglas is the way to go not quaranteen.
> The Flux and Reflux diagramme merely displays the so called gap that has
to be filled by bankers credit, there is no argument over that either.
> Peter H
>
>
> "William B. Ryan" <w_b_ryan@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > I have withheld from list distribution recent
> > submissions by Peter Haines and Marc Gauvin, which I
> > archived at
> > http://www.geocities.com/socredus/haines
> > and
> > http://www.geocities.com/socredus/gauvin
> > respectively for anyone who is interested in reading
> > them. I shall insist they address questions I put to
> > them on October 1 archived at
> > http://www.geocities.com/socredus/questions .
> >
> > I have withheld from list distribution recent
> > submissions by Peter Haines and Marc Gauvin, which I
> > archived at
> > http://www.geocities.com/socredus/haines
> > and
> > http://www.geocities.com/socredus/gauvin
> > respectively for anyone who is interested in reading
> > them. I shall insist they address questions I put to
> > them on October 1 archived at
> > http://www.geocities.com/socredus/questions .
> >
> > Unless they do so, further submissions from them, if
> > any, will be similarly archived at the above url's.
> >
> > Each of them under cross examination (and Per Almgren)
> > admitted, whether they realized it or not, that
> > interest does not "cause" anything. They reverted to a
> > somewhat theoretically superior though simplistic
> > "bankers' underconsumption" thesis, that if bankers
> > spend all their income there would be no problem. This
> > admission presents the opportunity to move forward in
> > our extrapolation of A+B.
> > -
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Some introductory materials to the discussion topic of this list are at
> http://www.geocities.com/socredus/compendium
> You're subscribed to this list with the email thomsonhiyu@shaw.ca
> For more information, visit http://www.eListas.com/list/socialcredit
|
Re: [socialcredit]
Reply to this message