| Subject: | Re: [socialcredit] censorship | | Date: | Wednesday, October 19, 2005 09:32:12 (-0700) | | From: | William B. Ryan <w_b_ryan @.....com>
|
| In reply to: | Message 2968 (written by Triumphofthepast) |
Michael, it's not a question of censorship but
moderation. Perhaps you should look the words up in
the dictionary. Just yesterday, October 17, I
approved two of John's postings for list distribution.
You can confirm that I did so from the Elistas
archive if you didn't receive them. I intend to
incorporate the full text of one or two others in
future replies, obviating the necessity for
distributing them separately.
And who are you to talk about censorship, anyway? For
more than a year you prevented me from so much as
looking at your "socialcreditactive" list archive at
Yahoo. Finally, once the list became moribund and
repetitive, you permitted me to look (and presumably
to post if I wanted to), where I found some valuable
contributions from Dianne Boucher, including some very
fine postings from yourself--that advance the science
that is social credit. I have archived copies
elsewhere for safekeeping.
-
--- Triumphofthepast@aol.com wrote:
> "Owing to censorship, I have been obliged to send
> this response via an
> alternative route." (John H.)
>
> We just got Peter back, and now this! Since I do
> not get censored, I am
> uncomfortable hearing a message like this. I do not
> think I am better than other
> people on this forum. There is simply no need for
> this, Bill! All the energy
> you spend policing could be expended extrapolating
> A+B, your ostensible
> subject! It's not for OUR benefit, I have not seen
> anyone else ask for it. And
> why does it always seem to involve people who are
> arguing with YOU? Giving it
> up would be a great weight off your shoulders. Give
> it up! C'mon, you can do
> it!
>
> Michael
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
|
Re: [socialcredit]
Reply to this message