| Subject: | Re: [socialcredit] Swanwick principles (The 'principle' of proper | | Date: | Wednesday, November 16, 2005 14:40:00 (+0000) | | From: | Kenneth Palmerton <kenpalmerton @................uk>
|
In-Reply-To: <001401c5ea25$ba44fca0$bad44246@cc.shawcable.net>
Hi Joe.
With the increasing need for airline passengers to book TWO seats
nowadays, including my own Son in Law, I take the "Waist " bit to be a
Freudian slip :-)))
Ken.
-------- Original Message --------
X-Envelope-From:
socialcredit-return-3079-kenpalmerton=cix.co.uk@elistas.comReceived: from
q23.elistas.net (q23.elistas.net [216.66.20.147]) by
mta02.mx.cix.co.uk (8.13.4/CIX/8.13.4) with SMTP id jAFNfDQY022297
for <kenpalmerton@cix.co.uk>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 23:41:14 GMTReceived:
(qmail 24733 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2005 00:50:40 +0100Received:
from mail.e-listas.com (66.7.164.206) by 192.168.0.150 with EMQP; 16 Nov
2005 00:50:40 +0100Mailing-List: socialcredit@elistas.com
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Post: <mailto:socialcredit@elistas.com>
Reply-To: socialcredit@elistas.com
List-Help: <mailto:socialcredit-help@elistas.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:socialcredit-unsubscribe@elistas.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:socialcredit-subscribe@elistas.com>
Delivered-To: list socialcredit@elistas.com
Delivered-To: moderator for socialcredit@elistas.com
Received: (qmail 24711 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2005 21:42:04 +0100
Received: from unknown (HELO pd3mo3so.prod.shaw.ca) (24.71.223.10)
by mail.egrupos.com with SMTP; 15 Nov 2005 21:42:04 +0100
Received: from pd3mr2so.prod.shaw.ca
(pd3mr2so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.178]) by l-daemon
(Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004))
with ESMTP id <0IQ000JQXKDPSSB0@l-daemon> for socialcredit@elistas.com;
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 13:46:37 -0700 (MST)
Received: from pn2ml10so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.80])
by pd3mr2so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built
Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IQ000D2ZKDPJM40@pd3mr2so.prod.shaw.ca> for
socialcredit@elistas.com; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 13:46:37 -0700 (MST)
Received: from default ([70.66.212.186])
by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004))
with SMTP id <0IQ000JEAKDOYWD0@l-daemon> for socialcredit@elistas.com;
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 13:46:37 -0700 (MST)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:47:00 -0800
From: Joe Thomson <thomsonhiyu@shaw.ca>
To: socialcredit@elistas.com
Message-id: <001401c5ea25$ba44fca0$bad44246@cc.shawcable.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <20051114232209.97784.qmail@web60512.mail.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [socialcredit] Swanwick principles (The 'principle' of proper
English)
X-Envelope-To: kenpalmerton@cixcouk.cix.co.uk
X-UIDL: _mcF.aIneDB.mta02.mx
(Bill Ryan wrote:-) "Airlines regularly "overbook," increasing the chance
that all seats will be filled, minimizing waist."
(Joe replies:-) While there seems to be more airlines these days that are
'flat' rather than fat, shouldn't "waist" above be spelled "w-a-s-t-e"? Or
are you proposing they only let people on board that are slim enough to
fittwo to a seat?
----- Original Message -----
From: "William B. Ryan" <w_b_ryan@yahoo.com>
To: <socialcredit@elistas.com>
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [socialcredit] Swanwick principles
> Yes, but "cash prices" if they equal "cash credits"
> does include profit, from which corporate dividends
> are paid and entrepreneurial investment is funded, in
> part.
>
> And it depends on what you mean by a "proper ticket,"
> doesn't it? Remember, it is only a metaphor, an aid
> to understanding.
>
> Airlines regularly "overbook," increasing the chance
> that all seats will be filled, minimizing waist.
>
> Which is perfectly analogous to Douglas' concept of
> demand made effective being the independent variable
> that drives the economy:-
>
> *The business of a modern and effective financial
> system is to issue credit to the consumer, up to the
> limit of the productive capacity of the producer, so
> that either the consumers' real demand is satiated, or
> the producers' capacity is exhausted, whichever
> happens first.*
> -
>
> As to the answer to your last question, I will
> eventually finish my dissertation.
>
>
> --- Triumphofthepast@aol.com wrote:
>
> "cash credits of the population...shall at any moment
> be equal to the collective cash prices"
>
> I take this as being quite straightforward: a dollar
> of (consumer) prices shall be matched by a dollar of
> consumer money -- not literally at every moment but at
> regular intervals -- in other words, that consumer
> money will function as a proper ticket. Douglas's
> statement, taken simply, reflects the fact that money
> comes in quantities. That is not the same thing, I
> think, as the Quantity Theory of Money. Nor does it
> hinder Douglas's projection of dynamic flows.
>
> Since Douglas makes perfect sense to me on this simple
> and straightforward reading, I am not tempted by one
> that requires a lot more exegesis to make plausible.
>
> Bill, have you a single essay in which you outline
> your interpretation of these principles or of A+B? If
> so, could you point me to it?
>
> Michael
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Some introductory materials to the discussion topic of this list are at
> http://www.geocities.com/socredus/compendium
> You're subscribed to this list with the email thomsonhiyu@shaw.ca
> For more information, visit http://www.eListas.com/list/socialcredit
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Some introductory materials to the discussion topic of this list are at
http://www.geocities.com/socredus/compendium
You're subscribed to this list with the email kenpalmerton@cix.co.uk
For more information, visit http://www.eListas.com/list/socialcredit
|
Re: [socialcredit]
Reply to this message