| Subject: | Re: [socialcredit] straw vote (Joe replies to Ken) | | Date: | Friday, November 18, 2005 20:25:00 (+0000) | | From: | Kenneth Palmerton <kenpalmerton @................uk>
|
In-Reply-To: <001a01c5eb93$847f9200$bad44246@cc.shawcable.net>
Hi Joe.
It is not at all mistaken of you to think me flippant. I have so little
respect for banking practices that it is the only proper response for me
to make :-)
I think one can go mad trying to wriggle through the unnatural intricacies
of the money system :-(((
As for "insurance" Joe. This is the land of Lloyds remember. The most
perfect gambling den ever invented :-)
But I ask you. If you loose what it has cost you nothing to create, WHAT
HAVE YOU LOST ?
Ken.
-------- Original Message --------
X-Envelope-From:
socialcredit-return-3097-kenpalmerton=cix.co.uk@elistas.comReceived: from
q53.elistas.net (q53.elistas.net [216.66.20.25]) by
mta02.mx.cix.co.uk (8.13.4/CIX/8.13.4) with SMTP id jAHHYx6m018299
for <kenpalmerton@cix.co.uk>; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 17:35:00 GMT
Received: (qmail 1379 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2005 19:04:26 +0100
Received: from mail.e-listas.com (66.7.164.206)
by 192.168.0.153 with EMQP; 17 Nov 2005 19:04:26 +0100
Mailing-List: socialcredit@elistas.com
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Post: <mailto:socialcredit@elistas.com>
Reply-To: socialcredit@elistas.com
List-Help: <mailto:socialcredit-help@elistas.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:socialcredit-unsubscribe@elistas.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:socialcredit-subscribe@elistas.com>
Delivered-To: list socialcredit@elistas.com
Delivered-To: moderator for socialcredit@elistas.com
Received: (qmail 25434 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2005 17:20:21 +0100
Received: from unknown (HELO pd2mo3so.prod.shaw.ca) (24.71.223.10)
by mail.egrupos.com with SMTP; 17 Nov 2005 17:20:21 +0100
Received: from pd4mr5so.prod.shaw.ca (pd4mr5so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca
[10.0.141.50])
by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004))
with ESMTP id <0IQ300CSJXLQS1B0@l-daemon> for socialcredit@elistas.com;
Thu,
17 Nov 2005 09:25:02 -0700 (MST)
Received: from pn2ml5so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.149])
by pd4mr5so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built
Mar
15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IQ300IVNXLQ8EA0@pd4mr5so.prod.shaw.ca> for
socialcredit@elistas.com; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:25:02 -0700 (MST)
Received: from default (S010600e02995b7b5.cc.shawcable.net [70.66.212.186])
by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003))
with SMTP id <0IQ3000H7XLPA3@l-daemon> for socialcredit@elistas.com; Thu,
17 Nov 2005 09:25:02 -0700 (MST)
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 08:25:26 -0800
From: Joe Thomson <thomsonhiyu@shaw.ca>
To: socialcredit@elistas.com
Message-id: <001a01c5eb93$847f9200$bad44246@cc.shawcable.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <memo.795826@cix.compulink.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [socialcredit] straw vote (Joe replies to Ken)
X-Envelope-To: kenpalmerton@cixcouk.cix.co.uk
X-UIDL: _QeE.G9LfDB.mta02.mx
(Ken Palmerton wrote:-) We are bidden to dance a merry dance, most of
whichis smoke and mirrors
> :-(
>
> That a banker makes much of "attracting deposits" is either the smoke, or
> the mirror. The reality is that he does not need them, other than to
> delude us the people.
>
> Were a trading bank to be compelled to lodge accounts like every other
> trading company, there would not be a solvent company amongst them. The
so> called "insurance" they hold will not, and cannot, save them. It is
more> propaganda for OUR consumption I fear.
>
(Joe replies:-) There are others on here who can give you a much better
explanation of how the system really works than I can, Ken. And I'm going
to let them do it, since it's important a correct understanding of it all
begained without introducing anything that might detract from that.
I don't particularly disagree with much of what you've said, but there is
quite a bit more to it than that. The 'so called ''insurance'' ' you
referred to above is not designed 'to save them', (the banks), but is
'deposit insurance' maintained (in Canada) with a Crown owned agency, the
Canada Deposit Insurance Corp. The US has an equivalent to that, the FDIC,
I believe. I don't know whether there is anything like that in Britain or
elsewhere.
This is to re-imburse the bank's depositors a specified amount of their
accounts in the event of the bank's failure. Credit Unions, which are
regulated Provincially in Canada, may also have such an agency. In BC
thereis one, a Credit Union Deposit Insurance Co. with which each credit
unionmust carry insurance on most types of customer deposits.
Joe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Some introductory materials to the discussion topic of this list are at
http://www.geocities.com/socredus/compendium
You're subscribed to this list with the email kenpalmerton@cix.co.uk
For more information, visit http://www.eListas.com/list/socialcredit
|
Re: [socialcredit]
Reply to this message