| Subject: | Re: [socialcredit] that bloke Say | | Date: | Wednesday, December 14, 2005 04:19:01 (-0800) | | From: | William B. Ryan <w_b_ryan @.....com>
|
| In reply to: | Message 3208 (written by Triumphofthepast) |
No, Michael, it simply means that they do not
automatically equate and require conscious adjustment.
So Say is refuted.
--- Triumphofthepast@aol.com wrote:
If Swanwick 2 meant "That the credits required to
finance production ARE, . . ." then Swanwick 1 would
have to mean "That the cash credits of the population
. . . ARE." In other words, Douglas would be
affirming Say's Law!
So yes, Ken, you've got it wrong.
Michael
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
|
Re: [socialcredit]
Reply to this message