| Subject: | [socialcredit] Swanwick 2 | | Date: | Wednesday, December 14, 2005 14:47:17 (EST) | | From: | Triumphofthepast <Triumphofthepast @...com>
|
Supposing Douglas wanted to convey, as a principle of social credit economics, that production should be financed with new credits, rather than savings, what would you have him say other than what he did say? No one with any ear for language or any respect for Douglas would suggest that in three parallel Principles using "shall be," one of them was a mistake for "are." There is really no question what Douglas SAID. The only question is whether he MEANT what he said. Because he didn't work out by what MECHANISM Swanwick 2 should be applied, some people refuse to believe he meant what he said.
Michael
|
Swanwick 2
Reply to this message