| Subject: | Re: [socialcredit] Re: Swanwick Principles: Wally comments | | Date: | Tuesday, December 21, 2004 23:42:04 (-0700) | | From: | Wallace M. Klinck <wmklinck @....ca>
|
| In reply to: | Message 375 (written by socred) |
Vic,
I concur. A Social Credit "National Dividend" is not derived from public
revenue (i.e., taxation) and is determined objectively by impartial
statistical means. Forms of "Guaranteed" Income are financed by taxation
and are established primarily by subjective politically motivated
determination. Without a clear differentiation of these two approaches, a
correct understanding of Social Credit is undermined from the outset.
Wally
----- Original Message -----
From: <socred@ecn.net.au>
To: <socialcredit@elistas.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: [socialcredit] Re: Swanwick Principles
> A National Dividend is not the same as a "Guaranteed Basic Income", a
> "Guaranteed National Income" or a "Guaranteed Annual Income".
>
> If people wish to discuss the National Dividend as per Social Credit, this
> is the forum. if people wish to discuss the other three "Guaranteed
> Incomes" please use another forum as it has the tendency to mislead and
> confuse others who may wish to become better informed on Social Credit
> Principles.
> V. Bridger
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> You're subscribed to this list with the email wmklinck@shaw.ca
> To unsubscribe, send a message to
> socialcredit-unsubscribe@elistas.com
> For more information, visit http://www.eListas.com/list/socialcredit
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> http://www.eListas.com/
> The Most Complete Mailing Lists, Groups and Newsletters System on the Net
>
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________
http://www.eListas.com/
The Most Complete Mailing Lists, Groups and Newsletters System on the Net
|
Re: [socialcredit]
Reply to this message