|
Given that we are very much in the public view in fact rather than in a
closed door private meeting, eviction is rather extreme, since being ignored is
just as effective.
The answers by those who care to do so are much more valuable of course and
given that we dont know what audience we have or their 'education' much more can
be gained by leaving things run their course. The other down side is that
we may be seen to be a starchy stuck-up lot holding conference is a telephone
booth.
Peter H
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 3:02
AM
Subject: Re: [socialcredit] Inflation and
Price Control - Douglas was biased
Bill, I'm sure I speak for most of the participants here at this board
when I observe that Dan Morin's comments to a more serious and sincere
list participant is way over the top. It is so over the top and so
full of incivility and venom that none of us can possibly take him
seriously. His "speculation" is unwarranted and is disclosed in a most
malicious manner. We cannot believe that he can have any serious grounds for
his comments at all.
You know how I get about people like this. I'm normally patient...for a
time. I'm not giving Dan any of my time, and neither should anyone else.
Bill, can find it within your big wide Texas heart to boot his lil' ol fanny
off this list?
Regards
Alan Avans
Prairie Village KS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Some introductory materials to the discussion topic of this list are at
http://www.geocities.com/socredus/compendium
You're subscribed to this list with the email cymric@xtra.co.nz
For more information, visit http://www.eListas.com/list/socialcredit
| 
Re: [socialcredit]
Reply to this message
