In-Reply-To: <000b01c64196$cfb6c780$bad44246@cc.shawcable.net>
Hi Joe.
I think it would be a bit more understandable if you completed Sydney
Webbs response to that explanation of Social Credit.
He rejected the ideas because "They were not Socialism" :-(((
There is much more contentions stuff from Webb, in a similar vein.
Ken.
-------- Original Message --------
X-Envelope-From:
socialcredit-return-3570-kenpalmerton=cix.co.uk@elistas.comReceived: from
q23.elistas.net (q23.elistas.net [216.66.20.147]) by
mta02.mx.cix.co.uk (8.13.4/CIX/8.13.4) with SMTP id k27A9kdn002862
for <kenpalmerton@cix.co.uk>; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:09:46 GMT
Received: (qmail 20268 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2006 11:46:06 +0100
Received: from mail.e-listas.com (66.7.164.206)
by q2.elistas.net with EMQP; 7 Mar 2006 11:46:06 +0100
Mailing-List: socialcredit@elistas.com
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Post: <mailto:socialcredit@elistas.com>
Reply-To: socialcredit@elistas.com
List-Help: <mailto:socialcredit-help@elistas.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:socialcredit-unsubscribe@elistas.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:socialcredit-subscribe@elistas.com>
Delivered-To: list socialcredit@elistas.com
Delivered-To: moderator for socialcredit@elistas.com
Received: (qmail 27555 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2006 04:18:45 +0100
Received: from unknown (HELO pd2mo1so.prod.shaw.ca) (24.71.223.10)
by mail.egrupos.com with SMTP; 7 Mar 2006 04:18:45 +0100
Received: from pd5mr2so.prod.shaw.ca
(pd5mr2so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.233]) by l-daemon
(Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004))
with ESMTP id <0IVQ006YQMRLNSB0@l-daemon> for socialcredit@elistas.com;
Mon,
06 Mar 2006 20:23:46 -0700 (MST)
Received: from pn2ml6so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.150])
by pd5mr2so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built
Mar
15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IVQ00682MRL7UD0@pd5mr2so.prod.shaw.ca> for
socialcredit@elistas.com; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 20:23:45 -0700 (MST)
Received: from default ([70.66.212.186])
by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004))
with SMTP id <0IVQ00FTUMRL0FD0@l-daemon> for socialcredit@elistas.com;
Mon,
06 Mar 2006 20:23:45 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 19:25:40 -0800
From: Joe Thomson <thomsonhiyu@shaw.ca>
To: socialcredit@elistas.com
Message-id: <000b01c64196$cfb6c780$bad44246@cc.shawcable.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <BAY21-F214F4277209EBAB4B9B5DCBDF70@phx.gbl>
<5d30943b61326c616812a679456d9d8c@geonomics.org>
<001501c63e17$4fa19fc0$bad44246@cc.shawcable.net>
<2b21814885e1569e2d549ed4a736cde3@geonomics.org>
<000f01c640c1$b2594b20$bad44246@cc.shawcable.net>
<9548d2be3c3ad52e903f4386ec68b2f9@geonomics.org>
Subject: Re: [socialcredit] Rent for everyone
X-Envelope-To: kenpalmerton@cixcouk.cix.co.uk
X-UIDL: _Kt.rvVDEB.mta02.mx
As a Social Crediter I never thought I'd have the opportunity to quote as a
response to anything that which British Fabian Socialist leader Sidney
Webb once told Major Douglas, after Douglas had explained his 'social
credit' proposals to him in detail. But I really can't think of any more
fitting response than that in regards to my feelings on 'Geonomics' :- "I
don't care whether the scheme is sound or not; I don't like its object."
And I don't.
Joe
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeffery Smith" <jjs@geonomics.org>
To: <socialcredit@elistas.com>
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 1:53 PM
Subject: [socialcredit] Rent for everyone
> On Mar 5, 2006, at 6:00 PM, Joe Thomson wrote:
> >
> > (Jeff Smith:-) (land) Wasn't exactly scare before then, just hoarded.
> >>>
<snip>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Some introductory materials to the discussion topic of this list are at
http://www.geocities.com/socredus/compendium
You're subscribed to this list with the email kenpalmerton@cix.co.uk
For more information, visit http://www.eListas.com/list/socialcredit
|
Re: [socialcredit]
Reply to this message