| Subject: | [socialcredit] missing context | | Date: | Monday, March 6, 2006 15:57:38 (EST) | | From: | Triumphofthepast <Triumphofthepast @...com>
|
I inadvertently transmitted the following without proper context. This time, the context follows:
I don't disagree with any of this. I thought you had an objection to my article. The article has nothing to say about sources or causes of Douglas's idea. It merely attempts to state accurately what the idea is.
Michael
"Believe it or not, the best example of inductive reasoning comes from the Sherlock Holmes novels. Collect date, organise it to make it better understandable, get rid of the obviously wrong answers, and go and have a good sleep, por play a violin, or indulge in hectic sport, or... The subconscious mind will come up with ideas. Treat each destructively to see if it can be eliminated. The one that can't be is probably the best, until new data requires it to be modified. It doesn't matter a stuff where Douglas' analysis comes from or what are its likely causes. Treated inductively it remains by far the best explanation of events last century." (Rawson)
|
missing context
Reply to this message