| Subject: | Re: [socialcredit] social credit in one nation | | Date: | Wednesday, December 22, 2004 12:13:00 (+1000) | | From: | socred <socred @.......au>
|
| In reply to: | Message 372 (written by Timothy Carpenter) |
I would not regard it as a flaw in Social Credit. The flaw, if one wishes to
call it that is that of the power of international finance. You are quite
correct in what you have restated but I suggest it could be rephrased again
something to the effect that;
If any country wished to introduce Social Credit policies they should heed
the warning of C.H. Douglas. When asked at a meeting what would be the first
thing to do if a country wanted to introduce Social Credit? Douglas replied,
"Arm yourself to the teeth".
It is precisely the reason why Douglas regarded the changes to the
financial system as being the "second trench to be taken". He was well aware
of the problem to be faced and why he pointed out that the first action to
be taken should be militant.Without a proper awareness of the philosophical
foundation and the consequences that would follow any attempt to introduce
Social Credit the cause will never succeed.
Vic Bridger
Vic Bridger
----- Original Message -----
From: "Timothy Carpenter" <timbeau_hk@yahoo.co.uk>
To: <socialcredit@elistas.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 4:31 AM
Subject: Re: [socialcredit] social credit in one nation
> Dear V. Bridger,
>
> Thank you for your keen eye. I shall rephrase in an attempt to make my
> point
> clearer -
>
> "Here is the flaw in SC as I see it. One cannot inject liquidity (National
> Dividend and the Compensated Price adjustment) to increase consumption of
> domestic production otherwise international trade orgs will slam down that
> country."
>
> If one is happy to move back to a tariff and trade barrier world then it
> is
> a further discussion :-).
>
> Right now the EU is being slammed for its agricultural subsidy. If tariffs
> and price adjustments are favoured then am I right in thinking "Le Methode
> Francoise" for supporting domestic production is endorsed?
>
> Tim
>
> On 19/12/04 12:37 am, "socred@ecn.net.au" <socred@ecn.net.au> wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 14 Dec 2004 6:38 pm, Timothy Carpenter wrote:
>>> Dear Bill,
>>>
>>> Here is a flaw in SC as I see it. One cannot inject liquidity only for
>>> domestic output of production otherwise international trade orgs will
>>> slam
>>> down on that country.
>>
>> The only flaw that exists is in the above statement where the premise is
>> false.Therefore the rest of the argument needs no comment.The basis for
>> injecting liquidity (I assume that this means the National Dividend and
>> the
>> Compensated Price adjustment) is not for domestic output of production.
>>
>> Production is not the problem. Consumption is.
>> V. Bridger
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> You're subscribed to this list with the email timbeau_hk@yahoo.co.uk
>> To unsubscribe, send a message to
>> socialcredit-unsubscribe@elistas.com
>> For more information, visit http://www.eListas.com/list/socialcredit
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> http://www.eListas.com/
>> The Most Complete Mailing Lists, Groups and Newsletters System on the Net
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> You're subscribed to this list with the email socred@ecn.net.au
> To unsubscribe, send a message to
> socialcredit-unsubscribe@elistas.com
> For more information, visit http://www.eListas.com/list/socialcredit
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> http://www.eListas.com/
> The Most Complete Mailing Lists, Groups and Newsletters System on the Net
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________
http://www.eListas.com/
The Most Complete Mailing Lists, Groups and Newsletters System on the Net
|
Re: [socialcredit]
Reply to this message