| Subject: | RE: [socialcredit] Rent for everyone | | Date: | Thursday, March 9, 2006 20:06:32 (-0800) | | From: | Joe Thomson <thomsonhiyu @....ca>
|
It imposes an 'external' control over the individual. And that makes it
incompatible with the philosophy of 'Social Credit'. And besides that,
in my own opinion, your 'rent' ideas are not even sound. If you read
the PDF file Wally Klinck sent you, you'll see our ideas about any
reforms involving 'land' differ substantially from yours.
I notice from your website that you've been supported by the 'Sierra
Club'. Those home-grown, 'court-room' eco-terrorists who've wreaked
more havoc and destruction to the lives of decent, hard-working, rural
Americans than an alien, rag-top outfit like Al-Quaeda could ever dream
of.
Is 'Earth, First!' a soul-mate to the 'single tax' idea, too? For
those not familiar with these so-called 'environmental' organisations,
the latter's founder, and a member of the board of directors of the
Sierra Club, issued that beautiful quote, "Phasing out the human race
will solve every problem on earth, social and environmental."
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffery Smith [mailto:jjs@geonomics.org]
Sent: March 7, 2006 7:58 AM
To: socialcredit@elistas.com
Subject: Re: [socialcredit] Rent for everyone
On Mar 6, 2006, at 7:25 PM, Joe Thomson wrote:
> "I don't care whether the scheme is sound or not; I don't like its
> object."
> And I don't.
Especially when you don't know it.
Not liking is always the easy part for humans.
SMITH, Jeffery J., President, Forum on Geonomics
7536 SE Milwaukie Av, Portland Oregon 97202 USA
503/232-1337; jjs@geonomics.org; www.geonomics.org
Share Earth's worth to prosper and conserve.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Some introductory materials to the discussion topic of this list are at
http://www.geocities.com/socredus/compendium
You're subscribed to this list with the email thomsonhiyu@shaw.ca
For more information, visit http://www.eListas.com/list/socialcredit
|
RE: [socialcredit]
Reply to this message