eListas Logo
   The Most Complete Mailing Lists, Groups and Newsletters System on the Net
      HOME    SERVICES    SOLUTIONS    COMPANY    
Home > My Lists > socialcredit > Messages

 Message Index 
 Messages from 3604 to 3663 
SubjectFrom
Re: [socialcredit] Jeffery
Re: [socialcredit] Jeffery
Re: [socialcredit] Jeffery
Re: [socialcredit] Jeffery
Re: [socialcredit] Peter Ha
Re: [socialcredit] Peter Ha
RE: [socialcredit] thomsonh
An Inflation Case Jeffery
Re: [socialcredit] Jeffery
Re: [socialcredit] Jeffery
Re: [socialcredit] Jeffery
Inter-war price ch Jeffery
Re: [socialcredit] Jeffery
'Geonomics' vs. So thomsonh
Re: [socialcredit] Kenneth
Re: [socialcredit] Keith Wi
Re: [socialcredit] Jeffery
Re: [socialcredit] Jeffery
Re: [socialcredit] John G R
Re: [socialcredit] John G R
Re: [socialcredit] Jeffery
RE: [socialcredit] thomsonh
Rent for everyone thomsonh
social credit, geo Triumpho
Re: [socialcredit] Peter Ha
Fw: [socialcredit] Martin H
Credit for everyon Jeffery
RE: [socialcredit] John G R
Re: [socialcredit] John G R
Re: [socialcredit] Peter Ha
Rent for everyone: thomsonh
RE: [socialcredit] John G R
Re: [socialcredit] John G R
Re: [socialcredit] Wallace
Re: [socialcredit] W. McGun
Re: [socialcredit] Peter Ha
this and that Triumpho
RE: [socialcredit] thomsonh
sorry Triumpho
Dividend in Social Triumpho
RE: [socialcredit] John G R
Re: [socialcredit] Keith Wi
RE: [socialcredit] thomsonh
Re: [socialcredit] Jeffery
Re: [socialcredit] Peter Ha
Re: [socialcredit] Peter Ha
RE: [socialcredit] John G R
RE: [socialcredit] thomsonh
land, money Triumpho
Re: [socialcredit] Kenneth
Re: [socialcredit] Jeffery
Re: [socialcredit] Peter Ha
RE: [socialcredit] John G R
Re: [socialcredit] Martin H
Re: [socialcredit] Kenneth
Re: [socialcredit] Peter Ha
Re: [socialcredit] Peter Ha
Re: [socialcredit] Peter Ha
Re: [socialcredit] Keith Wi
Douglas on the 'co thomsonh
 << Prev. 60 | Next 60 >>
 
socialcredit
Main page    Messages | Post | Files | Database | Polls | Events | My Preferences
Message 3652     < Previous | Next >
Reply to this message
Subject:RE: [socialcredit] Rent for everyone:- reply to John Rawson
Date:Wednesday, March 15, 2006  07:39:19 (-0800)
From:thomsonhiyu <thomsonhiyu @....ca>
In reply to:Message 3646 (written by John G Rawson)

Hi John,

 

I’m not sure I quite follow you here.  If you have a bank account and it’s ‘overdrawn’, then the Bank has, in fact, granted you a ‘loan’ to cover the amount by which it’s overdrawn.  The alternative would be for the Bank to not honour your cheques, returning them to whomever you’d issued them with a notation that there were’ Non-Sufficient Funds’ in your account to cover them.  Leaving you open to a possible criminal charge, in this country, of obtaining goods or services under false pretenses.  (And criminal penalties, if it can be proven in Court  that you actually did know your account balance was deficient, and had no prior arrangement with the Bank to cover such an eventuality.)  Many bank accounts here have an ‘overdraft protection’ feature attached to them.  Where the Bank will cover what would normally be NSF cheques up to a certain limit.  They are still, in effect, granting you a loan, (and charging you ‘interest’ for it, too, as you’ll find out when you get your statement).  

 

In business, the ‘first’ loan is the ‘easy’ one.  The ‘friendly Banker’ lives up to his reputation.  But God help you if, without prior arrangement of the possibility, you find you need a ‘second’ loan while any part of the first one is still unliquidated.  Here the Banker is apt to be a lot less friendly, for he has to guard against the possibility that you might be using the new funds he’s being asked to advance you to make the payments on the previous ones.  Rather than your actually generating some income from whatever entrepreneurial activity you’re saying you’re engaged in. 

 

Regards,

Joe

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: John G Rawson [mailto:johngrawson@hotmail.com]
Sent
:
March 14, 2006 7:20 PM
To: socialcredit@elistas.com
Subject: RE: [socialcredit] Rent for everyone:- reply to John Rawson

 

Thanks, Joe.  Agreed about their assets.

But in our country, our accounts are simply shown "in the red" (not literally these days, but with the suffix OD) for the amounts we owe.  There is no credit shown for the OD granted.

Regards.   John R.


From: thomsonhiyu <thomsonhiyu@shaw.ca>
Reply-To: socialcredit@elistas.com
To: socialcredit@elistas.com
Subject: [socialcredit] Rent for everyone:- reply to John Rawson
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:16:52 -0800

(John Rawson wrote:- ) Joe, just one caution on bank lending.

In this country, and possibly in Jeff's, banks make no credit entry in the borrower's account and the new money doesn't show up as a deposit until transferred to another account in credit.  And of course, if the other account is overdrawn by more than the deposit, it simply reduces the recipient's overdraft without showing up as a deposit at all. The money has a very brief life, the time involving the transfer from one bank to another.  It is cancelled out of existence when it meets an equivalent OD.

I just make this point to try to head off a long discussion based on slightly different methods in different economies.

Incidentally, where does your bank show your debt?  In a totally different account?.


(Joe replies:- )   I don’t have a Bank balance sheet at hand to see how it’s actually stated, but I would imagine your debt (the bank ‘loan’) would be shown as a type of “Account Receivable” on the books of the bank, and is classified as an ‘Asset’.  Same as any other business would classify its ‘accounts receivable’ as part of its ‘Assets’.  Your ‘Promissory Note’ is the physical description of that ‘asset’, just like your ‘tractor’ might be the physical description of an ‘asset’ in your books with a ‘money’ figure attached to it.  Just like you with your tractor, the Bank or anyone else holding a “promissory note’ (generally held along with some attached collateral ‘security’, like a ‘mortgage’), can ‘sell’ that asset.   

 

The bank’s ‘Loans’ are always considered to be its “Assets”, the corresponding ‘Deposits’ to those ‘Loans’, (and any ‘customer’ deposits, too) are its ‘Liabilities’.  As someone once said, “a bank can’t lend it ‘liabilities’ “, and it doesn’t.   Whether the Bank collects on its ‘accounts receivable’ (from you), or not, it’s still on the hook for whatever you’ve transferred out of your account as an ‘account payable’ (to others) so long as your account has a positive balance sufficient enough to cover that amount.  .

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Some introductory materials to the discussion topic of this list are at
http://www.geocities.com/socredus/compendium
You're subscribed to this list with the email johngrawson@hotmail.com
For more information, visit http://www.eListas.com/list/socialcredit

 



Read the latest Hollywood gossip at XtraMSN Entertainment

--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Some introductory materials to the discussion topic of this list are at 
http://www.geocities.com/socredus/compendium 
You're subscribed to this list with the email thomsonhiyu@shaw.ca 
For more information, visit http://www.eListas.com/list/socialcredit 

Services:  HomeList Hosting ServicesIndustry Solutions
Your Account:  Sign UpMy ListsMy PreferencesStart a List
General:  About UsNewsPrivacy PolicyNo spamContact Us

eListas Seal
eListas is a registered trademark of eListas Networks S.L.
Copyright © 1999-2006 AR Networks, All Rights Reserved
Terms of Service