Hi Michael,
I don’t really know how much of the
content on “neweconomics” Bill has made
available for you to read. But if you have access to the posts there from
the beginning, you might realize in
reading them that what you’ve said
of Bill’s ‘extrapolation’, “The best way to do that
would be to write it down in the form of an article,…” , unfortunately just may NOT prove to be “the
best way” at all in this instance.
Bill
is only part way through presenting his extrapolation to me there. And even allowing for the fact that I’ve
previously seen some of the material presented, and am not ‘hostile’
to any of it so far, it is quite
involved and necessitates his ‘going
slow’ and proceeding ‘one-step-at-a-time’ if I’m to understand it properly. I’m grateful to him for being willing to
do this. If he were to try to explain A+B any other
way, say through just writing an ‘article’ on it, I think he’d
probably only be perpetuating some of the confusion that’s long
surrounded it.
Even going the way we have been, if I were
not able to draw on the previous explanations Bill’s made over the past
few years in regards to ‘double-entry accounting’ conventions at the
higher, more ‘philosophical’ level, rather than the average ‘technical’
level most people like you and I operate at in our familiarity with bookkeeping,
I don’t mind admitting I’d be lost. There really is a vital need for a
comprehensive ‘Primer’ on the broader ‘why’ of “double-entry
accounting” conventions, as well as one on “banking” and “interest”. I hope something of that nature will be
included in Bill’s dissertation, when he finishes it, which would make it
all the more useful to anyone, at any level of acquired knowledge, in
understanding ‘‘Social Credit” .
Joe
.
-----Original
Message-----
From: Triumphofthepast@aol.com
[mailto:Triumphofthepast@aol.com]
Sent: March 31, 2006 1:13 PM
To: socialcredit@elistas.com
Subject: Re: [socialcredit]
"neweconomics"
Thanks, Joe.
"allow his full extrapolation to finally be viewed in its entirety"
The best way to do that would be to write it down in the form of an article, as
I have been begging him to do for a long time, so that one can respond to the
whole thing as a whole, instead of to pieces that appear in the course of
discussion. I think he shrinks from the commitment of a formal article,
which would then hold him to account. So far as I know, Bill has never
written a single article on social credit, only a dissertation-in-progress that
no one is allowed to see. You can pass this on if you see fit, and if he
ever does commit his ideas to a formal article, make sure I get a copy.
Otherwise, I don't see the point of more endless debate.
Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Some introductory materials to the discussion topic of this list are at
http://www.geocities.com/socredus/compendium
You're subscribed to this list with the email thomsonhiyu@shaw.ca
For more information, visit http://www.eListas.com/list/socialcredit
RE: [socialcredit]
Reply to this message
