Subject:
[socialcredit] Social Credit Lessons
I'm sorry, Joe, if you think I am more concerned (or at all concerned)
about WHO.
Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think what you’re asking Bill to do can be done in an ‘‘article’’ or a ‘‘series of articles’’, Michael. Douglas himself, and many, many others have provided reams of ‘articles’. And book after book. And still there’s disagreement over what he, and they, really meant. We are dealing not only with a very complex and difficult subject in itself, but also the only way Bill seems to believe Douglas could use to illustrate what he was really getting at. I believe Bill has considered A+B from a great many different angles, trying to find the correct and complete meaning of it in relation to the ‘real world’.
We all know, or at least ‘intuit’, that there’s ‘something’ there that’s absolutely correct. But some of the more common explanations, when examined closely, cannot be completely defended. I think the way Bill is currently approaching the subject is well worth attempting. Why not just look at it openly and objectively, and for the moment set aside any past perceptions and positions? No one is holding anyone else to account for their previous beliefs. As Bill has said before himself, we are ALL students when it comes to Douglas, and there’s a lot to be discovered there yet.
Joe
RE: [socialcredit]
Reply to this message
