| Subject: | Re: [socialcredit] Douglas: 1923 Ottawa - Part 1 | | Date: | Wednesday, January 3, 2007 20:33:34 (+1300) | | From: | <cymric @.......nz>
|
---- John G Rawson <johngrawson@hotmail.com> wrote:
Greetings for 2007.
Might I suggest that Social Credit ceased to be a science before the 1930's,
whenever Douglas' supporters started trying to "prove" the hypothesis (A+B)
instead of testing it against reality, along the lines this correspondence has
been heading and others.
All that is necessary to remedy the situation is to take it in its true context,
as a scientific model, and test it (and its orthodox opposite) by inductive
scientific reasoning.
But, of course, those with vested interests in the present financial racket will
do their utmost to prevent this happening, won't they?
I agree that this forum is fulfilling its aim of "studying the works of
Douglas", but I believe it has no useful function whatever in promoting his
message to others. Again, I agree that the later is not its function, but I think
others should also ber aware of that.
Greetings John,
I am only aware of supporters explaining rather than proving the theorem.
The only true experiement is in an economy. How can it be proved by reason?
If you can go ahead.
The opposition will be the same in both cases, as it has up till now. All
Douglas's ' reasoning' hasnt been respected by the orthodox world and any new
reasoning will be ignored likewise.
Peter H
|
Re: [socialcredit]
Reply to this message