| Subject: | RE: [socialcredit] Answering McGunnigle | | Date: | Sunday, January 7, 2007 19:55:19 (+0000) | | From: | John G Rawson <johngrawson @.......com>
|
| In reply to: | Message 4436 (written by William B. Ryan) |
Read the last sentence of my original. The proportion of debt money
isapproaching 100%.
Regards. John R.
From: "William B. Ryan" <w_b_ryan@yahoo.com>
Reply-To:
socialcredit@elistas.com
To: socialcredit@elistas.com
Subject: RE:
[socialcredit] Answering McGunnigle
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 06:21:59 -0800
(PST)
>"1. Is it untrue that the US financed part of the cost
>of WW2 without
borrowing?"
>----------------------------------------------------
>-----------------------------------------------------
>
>It
is untrue.
>-
>
>"2...Do you prefer power to be concentrated in an
>elected
democratic government, or an unelected and
>utterly unethically principled
commercial institution
>whose only requirement is to 'make a
profit'??"
>----------------------------------------------------
>-----------------------------------------------------
>
>What
I prefer is
that government remain an independent
>institution capable of being a check and
balance on
>non-government.
>-
>
>"Still, I realise we are then getting away
from
>Douglas, who would have agreed with you. But would he
>under the much worse
monopoly now
existing..?"
>----------------------------------------------------
>-----------------------------------------------------
>
>Please
explain how and in what way it is "much worse."
>
>
>--- John G Rawson
<johngrawson@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>Two comments/questions.
>
>1. Is it untrue
that the US financed part of the cost
>of WW2 without borrowing?
>
>2. Many
people in St. Petersburgh at least feel they
>were better off under the old
communist system. For
>example, formerly they were allocated flats
according
>to need (or possibly favour). Now they have to find
>3,000 rubles per
square meter to acquire one, or do
>without. The communist party was not elected.
Do you
>prefer power to be concentrated in an elected
>democratic government, or
an unelected and utterly
>unethically principled commercial institution
whose
>only requirement is to "make a profit"??
>
>Still, I realise we are then
getting away from
>Douglas, who would have agreed with you. But would he
>under
the much worse monopoly now existing, as bank
>credit almost completely repallas
fiscal money? Who
>knows!
>
>Regards. John
R.
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired
of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
around
>http://mail.yahoo.com
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>Some
introductory materials to the discussion topic of this list are
at
>http://www.geocities.com/socredus/compendium
>You're subscribed to this list
with the email johngrawson@hotmail.com
>For more information, visit
http://www.eListas.com/list/socialcredit
Need a new job? Check out XtraMSN
Careers
|
RE: [socialcredit]
Reply to this message