|Subject:||Re: [socialcredit] Reply to Bill McGunnigle ~ 'Ombudsman'|
|Date:||Saturday, April 21, 2007 18:30:01 (-0400)|
|From:||Joe Thomson <thomsonhiyu @....ca>
|In reply to:||Message 4719 (written by William Hugh McGunnigle)|
Thanks, Bill (McGunnigle). I thought I'd read somewhere you had an
"Ombudsman" in NZ, but wasn't quite certain.
In BC, the office hasn't exactly evolved as might be totally desirable.
'Governments' still control the budgetary purse-strings, and keeping the
"Ombudsman" from being too much of a nuisance to them is simply a matter of
witholding the financial 'means'.
Very interesting, the differences between Scottish and English law. I
believe Douglas made mention of some of the differences between how
permitted activities on private land were regulated in Scotland vs. England
in one of his later works, (in favour of Scotland).