| Subject: | RE: [socialcredit] Re: Swanwick | | Date: | Tuesday, May 29, 2007 01:39:55 (+0000) | | From: | John G Rawson <johngrawson @.......com>
|
| In reply to: | Message 4815 (written by william_b_ryan) |
In that case, Bill, please provide your own translation of what seems to me to
be a very clear statement in fairly basic English. Nor can I see any
transAtlantic variation in meaning of, for example, new production being financed
by new credits, not savings.
Regards. John R.
From: <william_b_ryan@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: socialcredit@elistas.com
To:
socialcredit@elistas.com
Subject: [socialcredit] Re: Swanwick
Date: Mon,
28 May 2007 15:15:52 -0700 (PDT)
>"Sorry Bill, I don't get this at all. If
savings are
>to be banned from use for production, as is
clearly
>stated...
>---------------------------------------------------
>----------------------------------------------------
>
>It
doesn't say that. Apparently you're reading
>something into it based on your own
preconceptions.
>-
>
>"I take it that Douglas wanted to stop the use of
>savings
completely, to prevent their effect in
>reducing purchasing
power."
>---------------------------------------------------
>----------------------------------------------------
>
>However
you take it, it is not based on anything that
>Douglas ever said or
wrote.
>
>
>
>____________________________________________________________________________________Get
the free Yahoo! toolbar and rest assured with the added security of spyware
protection.
>http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/norton/index.php
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>Some
introductory materials to the discussion topic of this list are
at
>http://www.geocities.com/socredus/compendium
>You're subscribed to this list
with the email johngrawson@hotmail.com
>For more information, visit
http://www.eListas.com/list/socialcredit
Live Search delivers results the
way you like it. Try live.com now!
|
RE: [socialcredit]
Reply to this message