National Socialism consisted of big business behind a Dictator, a situation
much closer to the present administration of your country than what we project.
Both systems could be made safe by the Swiss process of binding
citizen-initiated referenda, which we propose. Is there any movement towards
that in your case?
I agree that some of our proposals are not stricely as per Douglas, and have
stated that clearly.
A more useful way than emotionalism to counter our ideas would be to show
clearly how the prive discount and the funding of all new production from new
credits could be applied in practice. So far, we have had a lot of words and
evasions, but no hard detail.
Regards. John R.
From: <william_b_ryan@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: socialcredit@elistas.com
To:
socialcredit@elistas.com
Subject: [socialcredit] Sieg Heil!
Date: Sat, 2
Jun 2007 05:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
>"Our difference from the strict Douglas regime
is
>that, instead of giving money to consumers and then
>taking it away from them
in taxes, plus costs of
>collection, we would use some of it to replace
>taxation
at local and government levels. Only when we
>had removed a lot of the debt from
the economy would
>we pay a full dividend
universally."
>-------------------------------------------------
>--------------------------------------------------
>
>Then
I would say, Sieg Heil! This is national
>socialism, not social
credit.
>
>
>
>
>____________________________________________________________________________________
>Be
a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it
out.
>http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>Some
introductory materials to the discussion topic of this list are
at
>http://www.geocities.com/socredus/compendium
>You're subscribed to this list
with the email johngrawson@hotmail.com
>For more information, visit
http://www.eListas.com/list/socialcredit
RE: [socialcredit]
Reply to this message
