Dear Don,
I am not a member of the Socred list so only became aware of your
response because Bill Ryan forwarded it to Ownership.
I -- and many others in the UK including the Global Table -- am most
certainly aware of your excellent record and particularly appreciate your
regular electronz bulletin and your efforts to build co-operation.
I do feel that -- at last-- we are beginning to win. Yes, we'll keep
in touch.
Rodney Shakespeare.
>
> --- donzbeth@ihug.co.nz wrote:
>
> > Greetings Rodney, My commendations on your replies
> > to criticisms like the
> > one below.
> > You have dealt with the questions in a restrained
> > and logical way, and I can
> > assure you that most readers will recognise the
> > validity of your points.
> >
> > I write as a lifelong supporter of Social Credit who
> > has also made impacts
> > in other directions, such as the presidency of the
> > collapsing (1972) Social
> > Cedit Party (quadrupling its membership, and turning
> > it into a progressive
> > political organization); Chairing and driving the
> > WEL Energy (Community)
> > Trust throughout its 7 year commercial battle with
> > U.S. based UtiliCorp ,
> > finally succeeding in turning the Wel Energy
> > Electrical Company from a
> > 33% Trust owned, U.S. controlled Public Company into
> > a 100% Community Trust
> > Company, buying Utilicorp right out of the Waikato,
> > with a negotiated $116
> > Million Table Loan which the Company is servicing
> > and paying off at no cost
> > to the community; inventing special purpose
> > incubators in the hatchery
> > equipment business, and also the patented
> > MEASURITE Calibration System,
> > which is now internationally protected, ready for
> > production. And I've been
> > in the N.Z. Coy Directors Index for > 40 years.
> >
> > With that track record it pains me to see people
> > claiming to be experts in
> > Social Credit , and using odd sentences which
> > conflict with the Douglas
> > philosophy to try and justify what can only be
> > momentary lapses or
> > misinterpretations of his major works which made
> > valuable contributions to
> > economic knowledge.... At the Bard Conference in
> > New York last year I told
> > Delegates in the de-briefing session that if the
> > various independent groups
> > of monetary reformers around the world could
> > concentrate on their
> > overlapping and similar objectives, they would
> > become a powerful
> > progressive force; instead of continuing as many
> > inconsequential clubs,
> > separated by technical and mainly irrelevant little
> > barriers.
> >
> > While I would rather do more pleasant things, I have
> > convinced myself that I
> > should join your efforts in providing simple
> > explanations aimed at burying
> > some of those little barriers.
> > One of those is the absurd notion that the billion
> > dollar a day retail
> > industries would be amenable to supplying their
> > thousands of cash register
> > ribbons or computer discs to a state department
> > every day so that their bank
> > accounts could be credited with the right amounts of
> > Just Price Discount
> > for their 10,000 different items, none of which
> > now in advanced countries
> > like N.Z. have a single national price for any
> > product or service.
> >
> > Certainly I'll be happy to debate issues when
> > necessary, but I hope I'll be
> > spared having to debate rabbit powered arguments
> > in what should be a
> > horse-power field. No , I'm not joking. The email
> > prior to this one had
> > an assertion, probably intended to be serious ,
> > affirming that if a
> > government created its national money supply it must
> > be practising
> > communism. If that's what our schools are
> > teaching, then we sure have
> > problems......
> >
> > Yours in Social Credit, and do keep in touch.
> >
> > Don
> > B
>
|
Re: OWNERSHIP: RE:
Reply to this message